Raised in Berlin, Sao Paulo and NYC I now live in Los Angeles. I'm a rocker mom, wife, art collector, culture vulture and founder of this digital enterprise. I take pictures for a living.
www.reggieworld.com
Now that I find myself blogging and reading more blogs than ever I have to wonder, what are the ethics of blogging?
The Ethics of blogging
1- Honesty:
In certain countries journalists are licensed. That is not the case in
America, although I feel that sometimes it should be. Fact check your
sources, print accurate text and check your spelling and
punctuation. (please note: wikipedia is not fact)
Like your mother said, honesty is the best policy.
2:
Credits: If you are reprinting information or images give credit where
it is due. The internet is the public domain of the information
highway, but stealing is totally unacceptable. Plagiarism is
cheating. That little credit is always appreciated. If you are
doing a feature, ask the source if possible. Credit is a great thing
and its nice to get people's work out there so other's can follow up on
the trail.
3: Images: A picture is worth a thousand words, but
its nice to see some text. Try and furnish content whenever
possible. If you are publishing images, than follow up with a
sentence at the very least. Anyone can choose cool pics and post
them. What really makes a good blogger or tastemaker is producing
content. Remember, you are creating a record for a long time,
possibly forever in cyberspace. Post the date and location or film
or person and give a brief description.
If you are promoting
events, give a little backround on the promoter or crowd or music.
There is so much out there, a little filter is always good.
4:
Time: Try and post your information in a timely manner. If you are
covering an event or party make sure you get it up there asap. No
one cares once it has run in the tabloids. Old news is boring. If
you are talking about politics or News this is imperative. Op ed or
editorial comments can be published whenever. (although chances are
you will get more hits when the information is timely)
5: Fact v. Fiction: Distinquish whether your information is factual, commentary
or advertising promotion. Don't blur the lines.
6: Blogger as
subject-personality: Don't talk about yourself. Major pet peave here,
I'm sorry but no one is that interesting. Maybe Norman Mailer can
get away with it. You just come across as a blowhard. Your
sensibility is far more interesting. Talk about what you like, what
you did, and what you think. It does not need to be written in
relation to you. That's obvious. Your blog is a reflection of
yourself. Art imitates life. IF you are an asshole, the blog will
reveal it.
7: Standards: Hold yourself to a higher standard of
good taste. Keep language clean and upscale. Avoid gossip and
pandering. Save that for the celebrity blogs.
Hold yourself accountable if you make mistakes and correct them right
away. Never print something questionable, false or
unsubstantiated. If you move forward, state that you are in doubt.
If you hated the show, tell me why. Be ethical.
8: The
Critic: Don't be mean or vindictive. Realize that critism can hurt
someone, if you are writing a critique- fine. But realize that you
must be objective and present your reasons. Tell me why you hated it.
Always back up your opinion.
9: Knowledge is the beginning: Talk about what
you know or want to know. The best artists, writers, and musicians
write about what they know. If you are eloquent, nothing is
banal.
10: Titles: Cryptic titles don't work. They just
limit your hits and the links that will connect to your posts. Look
at magazine and newspaper headlines. They are always pretty
direct. The average reader spends 4-5 minutes on a website. You
better get their attention. If you write about something or someone
known you should have that name in the title to your post.
11:
Promotion: Feel free to promote your friends and occasionally your
business. If you have a line, book, project coming out-great. It is
ok to talk about it. But don't make it about yourself all the
time. Promote your friends, but as artisans or creatives, not
just because you know them. Nothing is more self absorbed than saying
I did this and that and I own this and that and I know that rockstar.
If the blog is too self involved it gets pretentious. Keep things
more accessible.
12: Information: List information,
links, videos etc. A great tool when you talk about something is to
link to a website or video. Blogs are about disseminating
information and this makes it easy for your readers to follow up on the
post. Your mission should be to create awareness for something and
let your readers follow up.
It also creates a link back and forth and increases your exposure.
Don't print incidents or content out of context.
13: Sensitivity: Never use tragedy or personal loss to exploit a story.
If you are writing about Katrina or the Beijing Earthquake be sensitive
to victims of tragedy.
14: Privacy: Realize that
celebrities are public figures and your friends may not be. If you
are publishing images or stories about private citizens be careful to
respect their privacy.
15: Motivation: Have fun, most bloggers
write for free so make it a pleasurable experience for you and your
readers.
( Adorable blogger in this picture is my friend Marina, and, no I never look
this great while blogging, nor do I blog on my lawn.)
by Rasmus Fleischer
Lead Essay
June 9th, 2008
to read more about this great article please hit this link:
How relevant is it to declare oneself to be "for" or "against" copyright? Neither the stabilization nor the abolition of the copyright system seems within reach. All we see is a seemingly endless assembly line of new extensions to the law being proposed and enacted. The most recent is the proposed "Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement" (ACTA) [1], to be tabled at next month's G8 meeting in Tokyo, including a clause known as the "Pirate Bay killer" that would force countries to criminalize services that may facilitate copyright infringement, even if not for profit. This is just one example of how copyright law is mutating into something qualitatively different than what it has been in previous centuries.
A very condensed version of copyright history could look like this: texts (1800), works (1900), tools (2000). Originally the law was designed to regulate the use of one machine only: the printing press. It concerned the reproduction of texts, printed matter, without interfering with their subsequent uses. Roughly around 1900, however, copyright law was drastically extended to cover works, independent of any specific medium. This opened up the field for collective rights management organizations, which since have been setting fixed prices on performance and broadcasting licenses. Under their direction, very specific copyright customs developed for each new medium: cinema, gramophone, radio, and so forth. This differentiation was undermined by the emergence of the Internet, and since about the year 2000 copyright law has been pushed in a new direction, regulating access to tools in a way much more arbitrary than anyone in the pre-digital age could have imagined.
This change has taken place because previously distinct media are now simulated within the singular medium of the Internet, and copyright law simply seems unable to cope with it. Consider radio broadcasting and record shops, which once were inherently different. Their online counterparts are known respectively as "streaming" and "downloading," but the distinction is ultimately artificial, since the same data transfer takes place in each. The only essential difference lies in how the software is configured at the receiving end. If the software saves the music as a file for later use, it's called a "download." If the software immediately sends the music to the loudspeakers, it's called "streaming."
However, the receiver can always choose to transform a stream to a digital file. It's simple, legal, and not very different from home taping. What now fills the record industry with fear is the possibility that users could "automatically identify and separate individual tracks from digital transmissions and store them for future playback in any order."[2] In other words, they fear that the distinction between streaming and downloading will be exposed as a big fake.
For example, Swedish company Chilirec provides a rapidly growing free online service assisting users in ripping digital audio streams.[3] After choosing among hundreds of radio stations, you will soon have access to thousands of MP3 files in an online depository, neatly sorted and correctly tagged, available for download. The interface and functionality could be easily confused with a peer-to-peer application like Limewire. You connect, you get MP3s for free, and no one pays a penny to any rights holder. But it is fully legal, as all Chilirec does is automate a process that anyone could do manually.
Cutting a recorded radio stream into individual tracks and entering each correct song title is easy, but takes lots of time. The open source community is continuously coming up with free tools for simplifying it, such as a program called The Last Ripper that can turn the on-demand streaming service Last.fm into a library of MP3 files.
Record industry lobbyists smell the danger, and now they are urging governments to criminalize such practices. On their orders the so-called PERFORM Act ("Platform Equality and Remedies for Rights Holders in Music Act") was introduced in the U.S. Senate last year. [4] The proposed law would force every Internet radio station to encrypt the transmission of file information, such as the name of the song. Yet anything visible on the screen can still be easily obtained by special software, encryption notwithstanding, and such restrictions would therefore be ridiculously easy to circumvent. Thus the PERFORM Act includes a follow-up clause banning the distribution of this class of software.
People with some programming skills, however, won't need to do much more than combining a few readily available and otherwise perfectly legal code libraries to compile their own streamripping tool, one that would circumvent the PERFORM Act. For regulations like these to be effective, it is necessary also to censor the sharing of skills that potentially can be useful for coding illegal software. The circle of prohibition grows still larger: Acoustic fingerprinting technologies, which have nothing copyright-infringing to them, but which can be used for the same feared identification of individual tracks, must probably also be restricted.
This domino effect captures the essence of copyright maximalism: Every broken regulation brings a cry for at least one new regulation even more sweepingly worded than the last. Copyright law in the 21st century tends to be less concerned about concrete cases of infringement, and more about criminalizing entire technologies because of their potential uses. This development undermines the freedom of choice that Creative Commons licenses are meant to realize. It will also have seriously chilling effects on innovation, as the legal status of new technologies will always be uncertain under ever more invasive rules.
Anti-piracy agencies are today fiercely attacking different kinds of search engines, solely because they provide links to files which may be copyrighted. This includes the bizarre case against Swedish BitTorrent tracker The Pirate Bay, as well as recent lawsuits against Yahoo! China and Baidu. Only Google remains largely uncontested, although they operate in the same gray zone of copyright. For example, the business model of Google Books is to display millions of pages of copyrighted and uncopyrighted books as part of a business plan drawing its revenue from advertising.
Gray zones like these are omnipresent in 21st century copyright law. One reason for this development is the uncertain status of the very idea of "copying" today. Contrast today's world with the golden age of copyright, roughly speaking between 1800 and 1950. Back then, enforcement was easy. The act of reading a book was far removed from the act of printing one. Record presses and gramophones were safely distinct machines. Since then, things have changed.
Copyright © 2008 LipstickTracez and Site AdministratorReggie Casagrande